|
1）Davies RF, Goldberg D, Forman S, et al. Asymptomatic cardiac ischemia pilot (ACIP) study two-year follow-up. Outcomes of patients randomized to initial strategies of medical therapy versus revascularization. Circulation. 1997; 95: 2037-43
|
|
|
|
2）Pijls NHJ, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharanet G, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functional nonsignificant stenosis: 5 year follow up ot the DEFER study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49: 2105-11
|
|
|
|
|
|
3）Tonino PAL, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360: 213-24
|
|
|
|
|
|
4）Lin GA, Dudley RA, Lucas FL, et al. Frequency of stress testing to document ischemia prior to elective percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA. 2008; 300: 1765-73
|
|
|
|
|
|
5）Pijls NHJ, van Son AM, Kirkeeide RL, et al. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1993; 87: 1354-67
|
|
|
|
|
|
6）Pijls NHJ, De Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary artery stenoses. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334: 1703-8
|
|
|
|
|
|
7）Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden. Results from the clinical outcomes utilizing revascularization and aggressive drug evaluation (COURAGE) Trial Nuclear Substudy. Circulation. 2008; 117: 1283-91
|
|
|
|
|
|
8）Shaw LJ, Iskandrian AE. Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2004; 11: 171-85
|
|
|
|
|
|
9）SantAnna FM, Silva EER, Batistaet LA, et al. Influence for routine assessment of fractional flow reserve on decision making during coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2007; 99: 504-8
|
|
|
|
|
|
10）Pijls NHJ, Fearon WF, Tonino PAL, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. 2-year follow-up of the FAME (fractional flow reserve versus angiography for multivessel evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56: 177-84
|
|
|
|
|
|
11）Nam CW, Mangiacapra F, Entjes R, et al. Functional SYNTAX score for risk assessment in multivessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58: 1211-8
|
|
|
|
|
|
12）Botman CJ, Schonberger J, Koolen S, et al. Does stenosis severity of native vessels influence bypass graft patency? A prospective fractional flow reserve-guided study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007; 83: 2093-7
|
|
|
|
|