|
1）Moscariello A, Takx RA, Schoepf UJ, et al. Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique-comparison with traditional filtered back projection. Eur Radiol. 2011; 21: 2130-8
|
|
|
|
2）Gosling O, Loader R, Venables P, et al. A comparison of radiation doses between state-of-the-art multislice CT coronary angiography with iterative reconstruction, multislice CT coronary angiography with standard filtered back-projec-tion and invasive diagnostic coronary angio-graphy. Heart. 2010; 96: 922-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
3）山科 章，上嶋建治，木村一雄，他．循環器病の診断と治療に関するガイドライン（2007-2008年度合同研究班報告）冠動脈病変の非侵襲的診断法に関するガイドライン．Circ J．2009; 73(suppl III): 1019-89
|
|
|
|
|
4）Newhouse JH, Murphy RX Jr. Tissue distribution of soluble contrast: effect of dose variation and changes with time. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1981; 136: 463-7
|
|
|
|
|
|
5）George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, et al. Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009; 2: 174-82
|
|
|
|
|
|
6）Vavere AL, Simon GG, George RT, et al. Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging using 320 row detector computed tomography: design and implementation of the CORE320 multicenter, multinational diagnostic study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011; 5: 370-81
|
|
|
|
|
|
7）So A, Lee TY. Quantitative myocardial CT perfusion: a pictorial review and the current state of technology development. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011; 5: 467-81
|
|
|
|
|
|
8）Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evalua-tion of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52: 1724-32
|
|
|
|
|
|
9）Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359: 2324-36
|
|
|
|
|
|
10）Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, Rochitte CE, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography according to pretest probability of coronary artery disease and severity of coronary artery calcification. The CORE-64（Coronary Artery Evaluation Using 64-Row Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography）International Multicenter Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59: 379-87
|
|
|
|
|
|
11）Watanabe Y, Kashiwagi N, Yamada N, et al. Synchronized helical scan technique for the evaluation of postoperative cerebral aneurysms treated with cobalt-alloy clips. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008; 29: 1071-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
12）Yoshioka K, Tanaka R. Subtraction coronary CT angiography for the evaluation of severely calcified lesion using a 320-detector row scanner. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep. 2011; 4: 437-46
|
|
|
|
|
|
13）Yoshioka K, Tanaka R, Muranaka K. Subtraction coronary CT angiography for calcified lesions. Cardiol Clin. 2012; 30: 93-102
|
|
|
|
|