文献リスト

1) Gersh BJ, Stone GW, White HD, et al. Phar­macological facilitation of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: is the slope of the curve the shape of the future？ JAMA. 2005; 293: 979-86

2) Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary. Circulation. 2004; 110: 588-636

3) Gershlick AH, Stephens-Lloyd A, Hughes S, et al. Rescue angioplasty after failed thrombolytic ther­apy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353: 2758-68

4) Carver A, Rafelt S, Gershlick AH, et al. Longer-term follow-up of patients recruited to the REACT (Rescue Angioplasty Versus Conservative Treat­ment or Repeat Thrombolysis) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 54: 118-26

5) Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Comparison of primary and facilitated percutaneous coronary interventions for ST-elevation myocardial infarc­tion. Lancet. 2006; 367: 579-88

6) Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment Strategy with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (ASSENT-4 PCI) investigators. Pri­mary versus tenecteplase-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 2006; 367: 569-78

7) Ellis SG, Tendera M, de Belder MA, et al. Facilitated PCI in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358: 2205-17

8) Fernández-Avilés F, Alonso JJ, Peña G, et al. GRACIA-2 (Groupo de Análisis de Cardiopatía Isquémica Aguda) Investigators. Primary angioplasty vs. early routine post-fibrinolysis angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation: the GRACIA-2 non-inferiority, randomized, controlled trial. Eur Heart J. 2007; 28: 949-60

9) Armstrong PW. WEST Steering Committee. A comparison of pharmacologic therapy with/without timely coronary intervention vs. primary percutaneous intervention early after ST-eleva­tion myocardial infarction: the WEST (Which Early ST-elevation myocardial infarction Therapy) study. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27: 1530-8

10) Cantor WJ, Fitchett D, Borgundvaag B, et al. Routine early Angioplasty after Fibrinolysis for Acute Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360: 2705-18

11) Danchin N, Coste P, Ferrières J, et al. FAST-MI Investigators. Comparison of thrombolysis followed by broad use of percutaneous coronary intervention with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation acute myocardial infarction: data from the french registry on acute ST-elevation myocardial infarc­tion (FAST-MI). Circulation. 2008; 118: 268-76

12) Fernandez-Avilés F, Alonso JJ, Castro-Beiras A, et al. Routine invasive strategy within 24 hours of thrombolysis versus ischemia-guided conser­vative approach for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation (GRACIA-1). Lancet. 2004; 364: 1045-53

13) Le May MR, Wells GA, Labinaz M, et al. Combined angioplasty and pharmacological intervention versus thrombolysis alone in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46: 417-24

14) Bonnefoy E, Lapostolle F, Leizorovicz A, et al. Primary angioplasty versus prehospital fibrin­olysis in acute myocardial infarction: a random­ized study. Lancet. 2002; 360: 825-9

15) Bonnefoy E, Steg PG, Boutitie F, et al. Com­parison of primary angioplasty and pre-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction (CAPTIM) trial: a 5-year follow-up. Eur Heart J. 2009; 30: 1598-606

16) Pinto DS, Kirtane JS, Nallamothu BK, et al. Hospital delay in reperfusion for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Implication when selecting a reperfusion strategy. Circulation. 2006; 114: 2019-25

17) White HD. Systems of care: need for hub-and-spoke systems for both primary and systematic percutaneous coronary intervention after fibrinolysis. Circulation. 2008; 118: 219-22

NPO医学中央雑誌刊行会 https://www.jamas.or.jp/ info@jamas.or.jp