|
1) Mori S, Kondo C, Suzuki N, et al. Volumetric cine imaging for cardiovascular circulation using prototype 256-detector row computed tomography scanner(4-dimensional computed tomography); a preliminary study with a porcine mode l. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005; 29: 26-30
|
|
|
|
2) Kondo C, Mori S, Endo M, et al. Real-time volumetric imaging of human heart without electrocardiographic gating by 256-detector row computed tomography: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005; 29: 694-8
|
|
|
|
|
|
3) Funabashi N, Yoshida K, Tadokoro H, et al. Cardiovascular circulation and hepatic perfusion of pigs in 4-dimensional films evaluated by 256-slice cone-beam computed tomography. Circ J. 2005; 69: 585-9
|
|
|
|
|
4) 安野泰史. CTAの技術進歩とその有用性 診断—その原理と限界. In: 冠動脈疾患のNew Concept. 東京: 中山書店; 2005. p. 97-104
|
|
|
|
|
|
5) Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically- gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation. 2001; 103: 2535-8
|
|
|
|
|
|
6) Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Schmitz BL, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. JAMA. 2005; 293: 2471-8
|
|
|
|
|
|
7) Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J. 2005; 26: 1482-7
|
|
|
|
|
|
8) Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. JACC. 2005; 46: 552-7
|
|
|
|
|
|
9) Ropers D, Rixe J, Anders K, et al. Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomograph with 64- x 0. 6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol. 2006; 97: 343-8
|
|
|
|
|
|
10) Fine JJ, Hopkins CB, Ruff N, et al. Comparison of accuracy of 64-slice cardiovascular computed tomography with coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2006; 97: 173-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
11) Motoyama S, Anno H, Sarai M, et al. Nonivasive coronary angiography with a prototype 256-row area detector computed tomography system comparison with conventional invasive coronary angiography. JACC. 2008; 51: 773-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
12) Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, et al. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990; 15: 827-32
|
|
|
|
|
|
13) Libby P. Current concepts of the pathogenesis of the acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2001; 104: 365-72
|
|
|
|
|
|
14) Schroeder S, Kopp AF, Baumbach A. Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multislice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 1430-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
15) Motoyama S, Kondo T, Sarai M, et al. Multislice computed tomographic characteristics of coronary lesions in acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50: 319-26
|
|
|
|
|
|
16) Motoyama S, Kondo T, Anno H, et al. Atherosclerotic plaque characterization by 0.5-mm-slice multislice computed tomographic imaging. Circ J. 2007; 71: 363-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
17) Das KM, EL-Menyar AA, Salam AM, et al. Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary multidetector CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessment. Radiology. 2007; 245: 424-32
|
|
|
|
|
|
18) Oncel D, Oncel G, Karaca M. Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis: Determination with 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography- Initial experience. Radiology. 2007; 242: 403-9
|
|
|
|
|
|
19) Pache G, Saueressing U, Frydrchowicz A, et al. Initial experience with 64-slice cardiac CT: non-invasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27: 976-80
|
|
|
|
|
|
20) Kurata A, Mochizuki T, Koyama, Y, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine triphosphate stress multi-slice spiral computed tomography: alternative to stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Circ J. 2005; 45: 2042-7
|
|
|
|
|
|
21) George RT, Silva C, Corderio MAS, et al. Multidetector computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging during adenosine stress. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48; 153-60
|
|
|
|
|
|
22) Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA, et al. Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology. 2008; 246: 742-53
|
|
|
|
|
|
23) Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C, et al. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose1. Radiology. 2008; 248: 424-30
|
|
|
|
|
|
24) Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM, et al. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology. 2008; 248: 431-7
|
|
|
|
|