|
1）Simons K, Ikonen E. Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature. 1997; 387: 569-72
|
|
|
|
2）Munro S. Lipid rafts: elusive or illusive？ Cell. 2003; 115: 377-88
|
|
|
|
|
|
3）Monks CR, Freiberg BA, Kupfer H, et al. Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells. Nature. 1998; 395: 82-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
4）Grakoui A, Bromley SK, Sumen C, et al. The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. Science. 1999; 285: 221-7
|
|
|
|
|
|
5）Huppa JB, Davis MM. T-cell-antigen recognition and the immunological synapse. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003; 3: 973-83
|
|
|
|
|
|
6）Pentcheva-Hoang T, Egen JG, Wojnoonski K, et al. B7-1 and B7-2 selectively recruit CTLA-4 and CD28 to the immunological synapse. Immunity. 2004; 21: 401-13
|
|
|
|
|
|
7）Egen JG, Allison JP. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 accumulation in the immunological synapse is regulated by TCR signal strength. Immunity. 2002; 16: 23-35
|
|
|
|
|
|
8）Phee H, Abraham RT, Weiss A. Dynamic recruitment of PAK1 to the immunological synapse is mediated by PIX independently of SLP-76 and Vav1. Nat Immunol. 2005; 6: 608-17
|
|
|
|
|
|
9）Kane LP, Mollenauer MN, Weiss A. A proline-rich motif in the C terminus of Akt contributes to its localization in the immunological synapse. J Immunol. 2004; 172: 5441-9
|
|
|
|
|
|
10）Le Bras S, Foucault I, Foussat A, et al. Recruitment of the actin-binding protein HIP-55 to the immunological synapse regulates T cell receptor signaling and endocytosis. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 15550-60
|
|
|
|
|
|
11）Boisvert J, Edmondson S, Krummel MF. Immunological synapse formation licenses CD40-CD40L accumulations at T-APC contact sites. J Immunol. 2004; 173: 3647-52
|
|
|
|
|
|
12）Gimferrer I, Ibanez A, Farnos M, et al. The lymphocyte receptor CD6 interacts with syntenin-1, a scaffolding protein containing PDZ domains. J Immunol. 2005; 175: 1406-14
|
|
|
|
|
|
13）Pacheco R, Martinez-Navio JM, Lejeune M, et al. CD26, adenosine deaminase, and adenosine receptors mediate costimulatory signals in the immunological synapse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005; 102: 9583-8
|
|
|
|
|
|
14）Keller AM, Groothuis TA, Veraar EA, et al. Costimulatory ligand CD70 is delivered to the immunological synapse by shared intracellular trafficking with MHC class II molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007; 104: 5989-94
|
|
|
|
|
|
15）Maldonado RA, Irvine DJ, Schreiber R, et al. A role for the immunological synapse in lineage commitment of CD4 lymphocytes. Nature. 2004; 431: 527-32
|
|
|
|
|
|
16）Molon B, Gri G, Bettella M, et al. T cell costimulation by chemokine receptors. Nat Immunol. 2005; 6: 465-71
|
|
|
|
|
|
17）Das V, Nal B, Dujeancourt A, et al. Activation-induced polarized recycling targets T cell antigen receptors to the immunological synapse; involvement of SNARE complexes. Immunity. 2004; 20: 577-88
|
|
|
|
|
|
18）Huse M, Lillemeier BF, Kuhns MS, et al. T cells use two directionally distinct pathways for cytokine secretion. Nat Immunol. 2006; 7: 247-55
|
|
|
|
|
|
19）Chang JT, Palanivel VR, Kinjyo I, et al. Asymmetric T lymphocyte division in the initiation of adaptive immune responses. Science. 2007; 315: 1687-91
|
|
|
|
|
|
20）Batista FD, Iber D, Neuberger MS. B cells acquire antigen from target cells after synapse formation. Nature. 2001; 411: 489-94
|
|
|
|
|
|
21）Carlin LM, Eleme K, McCann FE, et al. Intercellular transfer and supramolecular organization of human leukocyte antigen C at inhibitory natural killer cell immune synapses. J Exp Med. 2001; 194: 1507-17
|
|
|
|
|
|
22）Stinchcombe JC, Bossi G, Booth S, et al. The immunological synapse of CTL contains a secretory domain and membrane bridges. Immunity. 2001; 15: 751-61
|
|
|
|
|
|
23）Somersalo K, Anikeeva N, Sims TN, et al. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes form an antigen-independent ring junction. J Clin Invest. 2004; 113: 49-57
|
|
|
|
|
|
24）Purtic B, Pitcher LA, van Oers NS, et al. T cell receptor (TCR) clustering in the immunological synapse integrates TCR and costimulatory signaling in selected T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005; 102: 2904-9
|
|
|
|
|
|
25）Brossard C, Feuillet V, Schmitt A, et al. Multifocal structure of the T cell-dendritic cell synapse. Eur J Immunol. 2005; 35: 1741-53
|
|
|
|
|
|
26）Richie LI, Ebert PJ, Wu LC, et al. Imaging synapse formation during thymocyte selection: inability of CD3zeta to form a stable central accumulation during negative selection. Immunity. 2002; 16: 595-606
|
|
|
|
|
|
27）Lee KH, Holdorf AD, Dustin ML, et al. T cell receptor signaling precedes immunological synapse formation. Science. 2002; 295: 1539-42
|
|
|
|
|
|
28）Irvine DJ, Purbhoo MA, Krogsgaard M, et al. Direct observation of ligand recognition by T cells. Nature. 2002; 419: 845-9
|
|
|
|
|
|
29）Purbhoo MA, Irvine DJ, Huppa JB, et al. T cell killing does not require the formation of a stable mature immunological synapse. Nat Immunol. 2004; 5: 524-30
|
|
|
|
|
|
30）Faroudi M, Utzny C, Salio M, et al. Lytic versus stimulatory synapse in cytotoxic T lymphocyte/target cell interaction: manifestation of a dual activation threshold. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003; 100: 14145-50
|
|
|
|
|
|
31）Saito T, Yokosuka T. Immunological synapse and microclusters: the site for recognition and activation of T cells. Curr Opin Immunol. 2006; 18: 305-13
|
|
|
|
|
|
32）Krummel MF, Sjaastad MD, Wulfing C, et al. Differential clustering of CD4 and CD3zeta during T cell recognition. Science. 2000; 289: 1349-52
|
|
|
|
|
|
33）Bunnell SC, Kapoor V, Trible RP, et al. Dynamic actin polymerization drives T cell receptor-induced spreading: a role for the signal transduction adaptor LAT. Immunity. 2001; 14: 315-29
|
|
|
|
|
|
34）Bunnell SC, Hong DI, Kardon JR, et al. T cell receptor ligation induces the formation of dynamically regulated signaling assemblies. J Cell Biol. 2002; 158: 1263-75
|
|
|
|
|
|
35）Barda-Saad M, Braiman A, Titerence R, et al. Dynamic molecular interactions linking the T cell antigen receptor to the actin cytoskeleton. Nat Immunol. 2004; 6: 80-9
|
|
|
|
|
|
36）Tokunaga M, Kitamura K, Saito K, et al. Single molecule imaging of fluorophores and enzymatic reactions achieved by objective-type total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997; 235: 47-53
|
|
|
|
|
|
37）Yokosuka T, Sakata-Sogawa K, Kobayashi W, et al. Newly generated T cell receptor microclusters initiate and sustain T cell activation by recruitment of Zap70 and SLP-76. Nat Immunol. 2005; 6: 1253-62
|
|
|
|
|
|
38）Campi G, Varma R, Dustin ML. Actin and agonist MHC-peptide complex-dependent T cell receptor microclusters as scaffolds for signaling. J Exp Med. 2005; 202: 1031-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
39）Huppa JB, Gleimer M, Sumen C, et al. Continuous T cell receptor signaling required for synapse maintenance and full effector potential. Nat Immunol. 2003; 4: 749-55
|
|
|
|
|
|
40）Costello PS, Gallagher M, Cantrell DA. Sustained and dynamic inositol lipid metabolism inside and outside the immunological synapse. Nat Immunol. 2002; 3: 1082-9
|
|
|
|
|
|
41）Acuto O, Michel F. CD28-mediated co-stimulation: a quantitative support for TCR signalling. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003; 3: 939-51
|
|
|
|
|
|
42）Holdorf AD, Lee KH, Burack WR, et al. Regulation of Lck activity by CD4 and CD28 in the immunological synapse. Nat Immunol. 2002; 3: 259-64
|
|
|
|
|
|
43）Bromley SK, Iaboni A, Davis SJ, et al. The immunological synapse and CD28-CD80 interactions. Nat Immunol. 2001; 2: 1159-66
|
|
|
|
|
|
44）Spitaler M, Emslie E, Wood CD, et al. Diacylglycerol and protein kinase D localization during T lymphocyte activation. Immunity. 2006; 24: 535-46
|
|
|
|
|
|
45）Lin J, Miller MJ, Shaw AS. The c-SMAC: sorting it all out (or in). J Cell Biol. 2005; 170: 177-82
|
|
|
|
|
|
46）Lee KH, Dinner AR, Tu C, et al. The immunological synapse balances T cell receptor signaling and degradation. Science. 2003; 302: 1218- 22
|
|
|
|
|
|
47）Cemerski S, Das J, Locasale J, et al. The stimulatory potency of T cell antigens is influenced by the formation of the immunological synapse. Immunity. 2007; 26: 345-55
|
|
|
|
|
|
48）Varma R, Campi G, Yokosuka T, et al. T cell receptor-proximal signals are sustained in peripheral microclusters and terminated in the central supramolecular activation cluster. Immunity. 2006; 25: 117-27
|
|
|
|
|
|
49）Ludford-Menting MJ, Oliaro J, Sacirbegovic F, et al. A network of PDZ-containing proteins regulates T cell polarity and morphology during migration and immunological synapse formation. Immunity. 2005; 22: 737-48
|
|
|
|
|
|
50）Zipfel PA, Bunnell SC, Witherow DS, et al. Role for the Abi/wave protein complex in T cell receptor-mediated proliferation and cytoskeletal remodeling. Curr Biol. 2006; 16: 35-46
|
|
|
|
|
|
51）Nolz JC, Gomez TS, Zhu P, et al. The WAVE2 complex regulates actin cytoskeletal reorganization and CRAC-mediated calcium entry during T cell activation. Curr Biol. 2006; 16: 24-34
|
|
|
|
|
|
52）Bi K, Tanaka Y, Coudronniere N, et al. Antigen-induced translocation of PKC-theta to membrane rafts is required for T cell activation. Nat Immunol. 2001; 2: 556-63
|
|
|
|
|
|
53）Schaefer BC, Kappler JW, Kupfer A, et al. Complex and dynamic redistribution of NF-kappaB signaling intermediates in response to T cell receptor stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004; 101: 1004-9
|
|
|
|
|
|
54）Fleire SJ, Goldman JP, Carrasco YR, et al. B cell ligand discrimination through a spreading and contraction response. Science. 2006; 312: 738-41
|
|
|
|
|
|
55）Treanor B, Lanigan PM, Kumar S, et al. Microclusters of inhibitory killer immunoglobulin-like receptor signaling at natural killer cell immunological synapses. J Cell Biol. 2006; 174: 153-61
|
|
|
|
|