1)Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356: 1503-16
|
|
|
2)Hachamovitch R, Hayes S, Friedman JD, et al. Determinants of risk and its temporal variation in patients with normal stress myocardial perfusion scans: what is the warranty period of a normal scan? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41: 1329-40
|
|
|
3)Shaw LJ, Hendel R, Borges-Neto S, et al. Prognostic value of normal exercise and adenosine (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin SPECT imaging: results from the multicenter registry of 4,728 patients. J Nucl Med. 2003; 44: 134-9
|
|
|
4)Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, et al. Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomo-graphy. Circulation. 2003; 107: 2900-7
|
|
|
5)Pijls NHJ, Sels J. Functional measurement of coronary stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59: 1045-57
|
|
|
6)Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary artery stenoses. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334: 1703-8
|
|
|
7)Melikian N, De Bondt P, Tonino P, et al. Fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with angiographic multivessel coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 3: 307-14
|
|
|
8)Ragosta M, Bishop AH, Lipson LC, et al. Comparison between angiography and fractional flow reserve versus single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging for determining lesion significance in patients with multivessel coronary disease. Am J Cardiol. 2007; 99: 896-902
|
|
|
9)Kim HL, Koo BK, Nam CW, et al. Clinical and physiological outcomes of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with serial stenoses within one coronary artery. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 5: 1013-8
|
|
|
10)Park S-J, Ahn J-M, Pijls NHJ, et al. Validation of functional state of coronary tandem lesions using computational flow dynamics. Am J Cardiol. 2012; 110: 1578-84
|
|
|
11)Tonino PAL, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding PCI in patients with multivessel coronary disease (FAME study). N Engl J Med. 2009; 360: 213-24
|
|
|
12)Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56: 177-84
|
|
|
13)De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 991-1001
|
|
|
14)De Bruyne B, Fearon WF, Pijls NHJ, et al. Fractional flow reserve–guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371: 1208-17
|
|
|
15)Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2013; 34: 2949-3003
|
|
|
16)Bech GJW, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, et al. Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis : A randomized trial. Circulation. 2001; 103: 2928-34
|
|
|
17)Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49: 2105-11
|
|
|
18)Shiono Y, Kubo T, Tanaka A, et al. Long-term outcome after deferral of revascularization in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis and gray-zone fractional flow reserve. Circ J. 2015; 79: 91-5
|
|
|
19)Depta JP, Patel JS, Novak E, et al. Risk model for estimating the 1-year risk of deferred lesion intervention following deferred revascularization after fractional flow reserve assessment. Eur Heart J. 2015; 36: 509-15
|
|
|
20)Depta JP, Patel JS, Novak E, et al. Outcomes of coronary stenoses deferred revascularization for borderline versus non borderline fractional flow reserve values. Am J Cardiol. 2014; 113: 1788-93
|
|
|
21)Pijls NH. Fractional Flow reserve to guide coronary revascularization. Circ J. 2012; 77: 561-9
|
|
|
22)Johnson NP, Tóth GG, Lai D, et al. Prognostic Value of Fractional Flow Reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64: 1641-54
|
|
|
23)Kang SJ, Lee JY, Ahn JM, et al. Validation of intravascular ultrasound-derived parameters with fractional flow reserve for assessment of coronary stenosis severity. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011; 4: 65-71
|
|
|
24)Koo BK, Yang HM, Doh JH, et al. Optimal intravascular ultrasound criteria and their accuracy for defining the functional significance of intermediate coronary stenoses of different locations. J Am Coll Cardiol Interv. 2011; 4: 803-11
|
|
|
25)Ben-Dor I, Torquson R, Gaglia MA Jr, et al. Correlation between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound lumen area in intermediate coronary artery stenosis. Euro Intervention. 2011; 7: 225-33
|
|
|
26)Ahn JM, Kang SJ, Mintz GS, et al. Validation of minimal luminal area measured by intravascular ultrasound for assessment of functionally significant coronary stenosis comparison with myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol Interv. 2011; 4: 665-71
|
|
|
27)Gonzalo N, Escaned J, Alfonso F, et al. Morphometric assessment of coronary stenosis relevance with optical coherence tomography: a comparison with fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59: 1080-9
|
|
|
28)Shiono Y, Kitabata H, Kubo T, et al. Optical coherence tomography-derived anatomical criteria for functionally significant coronary stenosis assessed by fractional flow reserve. Circ J. 2012; 76: 2218-25
|
|
|
29)Shiono Y, Kubo T, Tanaka A, et al. Impact of myocardial supply area on the transstenotic hemodynamics as determined by fractional flow reserve. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 84: 406-13
|
|
|
30)Iqbal MB, Shah N, Khan M, et al. Reduction in myocardial perfusion territory and its effect on the physiological severity of a coronary stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 3: 89-90
|
|
|
31)De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Bartunek J, et al. Fractional flow reserve in patients with prior myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2001; 14: 157-62
|
|
|
32)Cuculi F, De Maria GL, Meier P, et al. Impact of microvascular obstruction on the assessment of coronary flow reserve, index of microcirculatory resistance, and fractional flow reserve after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64: 1894-904
|
|
|
33)Morris PD, Ryan D, Morton AC, et al. Virtual fractional flow reserve from coronary angiography: modeling the significance of coronary lesions: results from the VIRTU-1 (VIRTUal Fractional Flow Reserve From Coronary Angiography) study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013; 6: 149-57
|
|
|
34)Tu S, Barbato E, Köszegi Z, et al. Fractional flow reserve calculation from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and TIMI frame count: a fast computer model to quantify the functional significance of moderately obstructed coronary arteries. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 7: 768-77
|
|
|
35)Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, et al. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58: 1989-97
|
|
|
36)Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography fractional flow reserve from CT angiography. JAMA. 2012; 308: 1237-45
|
|
|
37)Nørgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S, et al. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: The NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63: 1145-55
|
|
|
38)Guagliumi G, Sirbu V, Petroff C, et al. Volumetric assessment of lesion severity with optical coherence tomography: relationship with fractional flow reserve. EuroIntervention. 2013; 8: 1172-81
|
|
|
39)Dehmer GJ, Weaver D, Roe MT, et al. A contemporary view of diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: a report from the CathPCI Registry of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2010 through June 2011. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60: 2017-31
|
|
|
40)Sen S, Escaned J, Malik IS, et al. Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59: 1392-402
|
|
|
41)Nijjer SS, Sen S, Petraco R, et al. Advances in Coronary Physiology. Circ J. 2015; 79: 59-61
|
|
|
42)Sen S, Asrress KN, Nijjer S, et al. Diagnostic classification of the instantaneous wave-free ratio is equivalent to fractional flow reserve and is not improved with adenosine administration: Results of CLARIFY (Classification Accuracy of Pressure-Only Ratios Against Indices Using Flow Study). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61: 1409-20
|
|
|
43)Sen S, Nijjer S, Petraco R, et al. Instantaneous wave-free ratio: Numerically different, but diagnostically superior to FFR? Is lower always better? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62: 566
|
|
|
44)Van de Hoef TP, Nolte F, Damman P, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of combined intracoronary pressure and flow velocity information during baseline conditions: Adenos- ine-free assessment of functional coronary lesion severity. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 5: 508-14
|
|
|
45)van de Hoef TP, Meuwissen M, Escaned J, et al. Head-to-head comparison of basal stenosis resistance index, instantaneous wave-free ratio, and fractional flow reserve: Diagnostic accuracy for stenosis-specific myocardial ischaemia. EuroIntervention. 2015; 11: 914-25
|
|
|
46)De Waard G, Danad I, da Cunha RP, et al. Hyperemic FFR and baseline iFR have an equivalent diagnostic accuracy when compared to myocardial blood flow quantified by [15O]H2O PET perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63: A1692
|
|
|
47)Petraco R, van de Hoef TP, Nijjer S, et al. Baseline instantaneous wave-free ratio as a pressure-only estimation of underlying coronary flow reserve: Results of the JUSTIFY-CFR Study (Joined Coronary Pressure and Flow Analysis to Determine Diagnostic Characteristics of Basal and Hyperemic Indices of Functional Lesion Severity-Coronary Flow Reserve). Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 7: 492-502
|
|
|
48)Petraco R, Al-Lamee R, Gotberg M, et al. Real-time use of instantaneous wave-free ratio: Results of the ADVISE in-practice. An international, multicenter evaluation of instantaneous wave-free ratio in clinical practice. Am Heart J. 2014; 168: 739-48
|
|
|
49)European Cardiovascular Research Institute. A trial to evaluate a new strategy in the functional assessment of 3-vessel disease using the SYNTAX II score in patients treated with PCI [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US); Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ NCT02015832
|
|
|
50)Nam CW, Hur SH, Cho YK, et al. Relation of fractional flow reserve after drug-eluting stent implantation to one-year outcomes. Am J Cardiol. 2011; 107: 1763-7
|
|
|
51)Ito T, Tani T, Fujita H, et al. Relationship between fractional flow reserve and residual plaque volume and clinical outcomes after optimal drug-eluting stent implantation: Insight from intravascular ultrasound volumetric analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2014; 176: 399-404
|
|
|
52)De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Heyndrickx GR, et al. Pressure-derived fractional flow reserve to assess serial epicardial stenoses : Theoretical Basis and Animal Validation. Circulation. 2000; 101: 1840-7
|
|
|
53)Pijls NHJ, De Bruyne B, Bech GJW, et al. Coronary pressure measurement to assess the hemodynamic significance of serial stenoses within one coronary artery: Validation in humans. Circulation. 2000; 102: 2371-7
|
|
|
54)Uren N, De Bruyne B, Wijns W, et al. Relation between myocardial blood flow and the severity of coronary-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1994; 330: 1782-8
|
|
|
55)Nijjer SS, Sen S, Petraco R, et al. Pre-angioplasty instantaneous wave-free ratio pullback provides virtual intervention and predicts hemodynamic outcome for serial lesions and diffuse coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 7: 1386-96
|
|
|
56)Nijjer SS, Sen S, Petraco R, The instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) pullback: A novel innovation using baseline physiology to optimise coronary angioplasty in tandem lesions. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015; 16: 167-71
|
|
|
57)Kim K-H, Doh J-H, Koo B-K, et al. A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 7: 72-8
|
|
|
58)Taylor CA, Fonte TA, Min JK. Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: Scientific basis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61: 2233-41
|
|
|
59)Chatzizisis YS, Coskun AU, Jonas M, et al. Role of endothelial shear stress in the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling: molecular, cellular, and vascular behavior. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49: 2379-93
|
|
|
60)Chatzizisis YS, Jonas M, Coskun AU, et al. Prediction of the localization of high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques on the basis of low endothelial shear stress-an intravascular ultrasound and histopathology natural history study. Circulation. 2008; 117: 993-1002
|
|
|
61)Gijsen FJH, Wentzel JJ, Thury A, et al. Strain distribution over plaques in human coronary arteries relates to shear stress. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008; 295: H1608-14
|
|
|
62)Fukumoto Y, Hiro T, Fujii T, et al. Localized elevation of shear stress is related to coronary plaque rupture. A 3-Dimensional Intravascular Ultrasound Study with In-vivo color mapping of shear stress distribution. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 51: 645-50
|
|
|
63)Samady H, Eshtehardi P, McDaniel MC, et al. Coronary artery wall shear stress is associated with progression and transformation of atherosclerotic plaque and arterial remodeling in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2011; 124: 779-88
|
|
|
64)Feldman CL, Investigators P. Prediction of progression of coronary artery disease and clinical outcomes using vascular profiling of endothelial shear stress and arterial plaque. Characteristics. 2012; 172-81
|
|
|
65)Vergallo R, Papafaklis MI, Yonetsu T, et al. Endothelial shear stress and coronary plaque characteristics in humans. Crre Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014; 6: 905-11
|
|
|
66)Koo BK. The present and future of fractional flow reserve. Circ J. 2014; 78: 1048-54
|
|
|