|
1）Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(12): 1207-17
|
|
|
|
2）Regge D, Laudi C, Galatola G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer. JAMA. 2009; 301(23): 2453-61
|
|
|
|
|
|
3）Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D, et al. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk popu-lation. Gut. 2009; 58(2): 241-8
|
|
|
|
|
|
4）Halligan S, Lilford RJ, Wardle J, et al. Design of a multicentre randomized trial to evaluate CT colonography versus colonoscopy or barium enema for diagnosis of colonic cancer in older symptomatic patients: the SIGGAR study. Trials. 2007; 8: 32
|
|
|
|
|
|
5）von Wagner C, Smith S, Halligan S, et al. Patient acceptability of CT colonography compared with double contrast barium enema: results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial of symptomatic patients. Eur Radiol
|
|
|
|
|
|
6）von Wagner C, Ghanouni A, Halligan S, et al. Patient acceptability and psychologic con-sequences of CT colonography compared with those of colonoscopy: results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial of symptomatic patients. Radiology. 2012; 263(3): 723-31
|
|
|
|
|
|
7）von Wagner C, Smith S, Halligan S, et al. Patient acceptability of CT colonography compared with double contrast barium enema: results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial of symptomatic patients. Eur Radiol. 2011; 21(10): 2046-55
|
|
|
|
|
|
8）Neri E, Halligan S, Hellstrom M, et al. The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol. 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
9）Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Marrannes J, et al. CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184(6): 1836-42
|
|
|
|
|
|
10）Zalis ME, Perumpillichira JJ, Magee C, et al. Tagging-based, electronically cleansed CT colonography: evaluation of patient comfort and image readability. Radiology. 2006; 239(1): 149-59
|
|
|
|
|
|
11）Slater A, Planner A, Bungay HK, et al. Three-day regimen improves faecal tagging for minimal preparation CT examination of the colon. Br J Radiol. 2009; 82(979): 545-8
|
|
|
|
|
|
12）Neri E, Turini F, Cerri F, et al. CT colonography: same-day tagging regimen with iodixanol and reduced cathartic preparation. Abdominal imaging. 2009; 34(5): 642-7
|
|
|
|
|
|
13）Campanella D, Morra L, Delsanto S, et al. Comparison of three different iodine-based bowel regimens for CT colonography. Eur Radiol. 2010; 20(2): 348-58
|
|
|
|
|
|
14）Zueco Zueco C, Sobrido Sampedro C, Corroto JD, et al. CT colonography without cathartic preparation: positive predictive value and patient experience in clinical practice. Eur Radiol. 2012; 22(6): 1195-204
|
|
|
|
|
|
15）Liedenbaum MH, Denters MJ, Zijta FM, et al. Reducing the oral contrast dose in CT colono-graphy: evaluation of faecal tagging quality and patient acceptance. Clinical Radiology. 2011; 66(1): 30-7
|
|
|
|
|
|
16）Pickhardt PJ. Incidence of colonic perforation at CT colonography: review of existing data and implications for screening of asymptomatic adults. Radiology. 2006; 239(2): 313-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
17）Dachman AH. Advice for optimizing colonic distention and minimizing risk of perforation during CT colonography. Radiology. 2006; 239(2): 317-21
|
|
|
|
|
|
18）Burling D, Halligan S, Slater A, et al. Potentially serious adverse events at CT colonography in symptomatic patients: national survey of the United Kingdom. Radiology. 2006; 239(2): 464-71
|
|
|
|
|
|
19）Sosna J, Blachar A, Amitai M, et al. Colonic perforation at CT colonography: assessment of risk in a multicenter large cohort. Radiology. 2006; 239(2): 457-63
|
|
|
|
|
|
20）Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Taylor AJ. Asymptomatic pneumatosis at CT colonography: a benign self-limited imaging finding distinct from perforation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 190(2): W112-7
|
|
|
|
|
|
21）Halligan S, Altman DG, Mallett S, et al. Com-puted tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection. Gastroenterology. 2006; 131(6): 1690-9
|
|
|
|
|
|
22）Taylor SA, Charman SC, Lefere P, et al. CT colonography: investigation of the optimum reader paradigm by using computer-aided detection software. Radiology. 2008; 246(2): 463-71.
|
|
|
|
|
|
23）Mang T, Peloschek P, Plank C, et al. Effect of computer-aided detection as a second reader in multidetector-row CT colonography. Eur Radiol. 2007; 17(10): 2598-607
|
|
|
|
|
|
24）Petrick N, Haider M, Summers RM, et al. CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study. Radiology. 2008; 246(1): 148-56
|
|
|
|
|
|
25）Taylor SA, Halligan S, Slater A, et al. Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D trans-verse analysis with computer-assisted reader software. Radiology. 2006; 239(3): 759-67
|
|
|
|
|
|
26）Yoshida H, Dachman AH. CAD techniques, challenges, and controversies in computed tomographic colonography. Abdom Imaging. 2005; 30(1): 26-41
|
|
|
|
|
|
27）Summers RM, Yao J, Pickhardt PJ, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population. Gastroenterology. 2005; 129(6): 1832-44
|
|
|
|
|
|
28）Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Wilson LA, et al. Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology. 2003; 125(2): 311-9
|
|
|
|
|
|
29）Lawrence EM, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, et al. Colorectal polyps: stand-alone performance of computer-aided detection in a large asympto-matic screening population. Radiology. 2010; 256(3): 791-8
|
|
|
|
|
|
30）Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D, et al. Computer-assisted reader software versus expert reviewers for polyp detection on CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 186(3): 696-702
|
|
|
|
|
|
31）Halligan S, Taylor SA, Dehmeshki J, et al. Computer-assisted detection for CT colono-graphy: external validation. Clin Radiol. 2006; 61(9): 758-63; discussion 64-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
32）Dehmeshki J, Halligan S, Taylor SA, et al. Computer assisted detection software for CT colonography: effect of sphericity filter on performance characteristics for patients with and without fecal tagging. Eur Radiol. 2007; 17(3): 662-8
|
|
|
|
|
|
33）Dachman AH, Obuchowski NA, Hoffmeister JW, et al. Effect of computer-aided detection for CT colonography in a multireader, multicase trial. Radiology. 256(3): 827-35
|
|
|
|
|
|
34）Morimoto T, Iinuma G, Shiraishi J, et al. Computer-aided detection in computed tomo-graphy colonography: current status and problems with detection of early colorectal cancer. Radiation Medicine. 2008; 26(5): 261-9
|
|
|
|
|
35）Burling D, Moore A, Marshall M, et al. Virtual colonoscopy: effect of computer-assisted detec-tion (CAD) on radiographer performance. Clin Radiol. 2008; 63(5): 549-56
|
|
|
|
|
|
36）Halligan S, Mallett S, Altman DG, et al. Incremental benefit of computer-aided detection when used as a second and concurrent reader of CT colonographic data: multiobserver study. Radiology. 2011; 258(2): 469-76
|
|
|
|
|
|
37）de Vries AH, Jensch S, Liedenbaum MH, et al. Does a computer-aided detection algorithm in a second read paradigm enhance the performance of experienced computed tomography colono-graphy readers in a population of increased risk? Eur Radiol. 2009; 19(4): 941-50
|
|
|
|
|
|
38）Pickhardt PJ, Lee AD, Taylor AJ, et al. Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screen-ing CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 189(6): 1451-6
|
|
|
|
|